Legal Opinion
Kiedos v. Apfel
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 23, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-30149-MAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, without objection. The motions to dismiss are allowed.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 20) and DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 26)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Kenneth Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”), claims that Plaintiffs’ complaints are moot due to intervening legislation and the voluntary cessation of the challenged policy. In response, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Boston's Children First v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Boston's Children First v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Bitsacos v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005