Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Dean Michael, A/K/A Mike Thompson, A/K/A Mike Johnson, Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1981No. 79-2679PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:

This criminal prosecution requires us to determine the appropriate standard for the warrantless installation of an electronic tracking device (a “beeper”) on the exterior of a vehicle parked in a public place. The question remains one of first impression for this circuit because of our equally divided vote when considering the same issue in United States v. Holmes, 537 F.2d 227 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc); see id. at 228 (Ainsworth, J., dissenting). As in Holmes, this case was placed en banc because of its exceptional importance.1

Defendant-appellee Barry Dean Michael…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence RoyalstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Cyrus Jonathan GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Houshang SheikhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. McDonell v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Geronimo Muniz-MelchorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API