State v. Dannebohm
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,981 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. BRANDON ALVIN DANNEBOHM, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When a defendant's standing to challenge a search is in question, the burden falls on the defendant to show an expectation of privacy in the property searched. Defendants may testify at a suppression hearing to establish their standing to challenge a search without jeopardizing their defense at trial. 2. To have standing to challenge a home search, a guest must show a degree of acceptance into the household or an ongoing and meaningful connection…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.