Sunrise Club, Inc. v. Shapo, Freeman & Bloom, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
We grant the appellees’ motion for clarification, withdraw the opinion filed June 20, 2001, and substitute the following:
Appellants appeal a non-final order granting the appellees’ motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration. We find the trial judge erred in making factual determinations which were unsupported by the record, without conducting an eviden-tiary hearing. See Jalis Construction, Inc. v. Mintz, 724 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial judge to hold an .expedited evidentiary hearing to determine…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- JALIS CONST. INC. v. MintzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Loyola Development Ltd. v. M.J. Anderson Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998