United States v. Brewer
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified (9 M.J. 16) the two questions that follow:
I. WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN HOLDING THAT THE PRESUMPTION OF DENIAL OF SPEEDY DISPOSITION PRESCRIBED IN DUNLAP V. CONVENING AUTHORITY, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974) APPLIED IN THIS CASE?
II. IF ISSUE I IS ANSWERED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN HOLDING THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR' MORE THAN 90 DAYS BETWEEN THE DATE OF TRIAL AND THE DATE OF ACTION?
We answer the first question in the affirmative.1 The Court of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. SawyerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. BrewerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
4Cited by1 opinion
- Vorbeck v. Commanding OfficerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981