Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1966No. 5283PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

At common law and by statute, the duties of police officers and constables have long been those of “conservators of the peace.” RSA 105:3; Sheriffs and Constables s. 3, 80 C.J.S. 154. At least as early as 1842 they were authorized to make regulations in the interest of public safety (R.S., c. 114, s. 7 (1842)), and in 1877 the Legislature extended the authority to regulations “for determining the time of night at which . . . eating-houses and restaurants shall be closed, and prohibiting the keeping open such places on the Lord’s day.” Laws 1877, c. 30; RSA 105:6. The right of a city to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarke v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Thistlewood v. Trial MagistrateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Hart v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Anton's of Reading, Inc. v. Town of ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. State v. TheodosopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Donnelly v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Blais v. Town of GoffstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Fasino v. Mayor & Members of Borough Council of MontvaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API