Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1973No. 73-162PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

A jury awarded appellee $2,000 for compensatory damages in a cause of action based upon malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The sole contention on appeal is that the abuse of process instruction was not warranted by the evidence.

In determining if the evidence is sufficient to submit a cause or issue to the jury, we review the evidence most favorable to the appellee. Baldwin v. Wingfield, 191 Ark. 129, 85 S.W. 2d 689 (1935). Appellee Nelson was hired by appellant McAdams as an assistant driver to Harold Starnes in the operation of one of McAdams’ fleet of tractor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Baxley v. LasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Lewis v. BurdineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Regions Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Palmer Ford, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Union National Bank v. KutaitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Farm Service Cooperative, Inc. v. Goshen Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API