Ford v. Weishaus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCatterson, J.
I must respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the defendant’s affidavit in support of the motion for summary judgment is consistent with her prior deposition testimony. Contrary to the motion court’s determination, there simply was no triable issue of fact as to whether there is a new lease with new terms that obligated the defendant to maintain the building where the plaintiff was injured. Accordingly, I believe the defendant established that she is an out-of-possession landlord entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
The plaintiff injured his knee, hip and back on or about June 21,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- City of New York v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Johnson v. Urena Service CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kalt v. RitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Bosshart v. PryceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.