Legal Opinion

Sohosky v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 20, 1971No. Docket Nos. 4162-70, 4239-70Published

When X died his estate consisted largely of stock of a family corporation. By the terms of his will, his widow received the stock -- "for and during her life, with full power to sell or dispose of all or any part thereof as she may see fit during her lifetime." Some time after X's death, his widow transferred her interest in the stock to her sons (petitioners herein). Held, the sons purchased the entire interest in the stock and not just a life estate therein.

Read the full summary

When X died his estate consisted largely of stock of a family corporation. By the terms of his will, his widow received the stock -- "for and during her life, with full power to sell or dispose of all or any part thereof as she may see fit during her lifetime." Some time after X's death, his widow transferred her interest in the stock to her sons (petitioners herein). Held, the sons purchased the entire interest in the stock and not just a life estate therein. Therefore, as the stock was an intangible asset with an unlimited, or not reasonably ascertainable, useful life, petitioners are not…

1Opinion of the Court

Henry W. Sohosky and Donna Sohosky, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent; John J. Sohosky, Jr., and M. Jean Sohosky, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Sohosky v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 4162-70, 4239-70

United States Tax Court

57 T.C. 403; 1971 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 7;

December 20, 1971, Filed

Decisions will be entered for the respondent.

When X died his estate consisted largely of stock of a family corporation. By the terms of his will, his widow received the stock -- "for and during her life, with full power to sell or dispose of all or any part…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Estate of Christ v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Housman v. LewellenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Garland v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Burnet v. BurnetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API