Legal Opinion

The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Joe L. Smith and Amy Jane Smith, D/B/A Smith Mercantile Company, and Guarantee Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1971No. 83-70_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, District Judge.

Two questions are presented for decision on this appeal. The first and primary issue before us is whether the procuring of a new fire insurance policy with the intention that it substitute for an existing policy serves to effect a cancellation of an insured’s existing fire insurance policy. The second question is whether an insured’s testimony as to value of fixtures, if such opinion is the only evidence on the issue in the case, must be accepted as the proper amount of damages to be awarded.

The facts pertinent to the resolution of these questions are as follows:

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Rochester American Ins. Co. v. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Atlantic Fire Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Northern Insurance Company of New York v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. National Investors Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Cleveland v. Dyn-A-Mite Pest Control, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Graves v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. S & S PropertiesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Williamson v. ParisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API