Legal Opinion

Florence A. Haneke v. United States of America, Florence A. Haneke v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1977No. 76-1278, 76-1279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

Florence A. Haneke appeals the judgment of the district court holding that transfers which she made from four joint savings accounts to her separate accounts were in contemplation of the death of her husband, August B. Haneke. 1 The government cross-appeals, assigning error to the court’s ruling that her transfers of another joint savings account and jointly held savings bonds were not made in contemplation of his death. We conclude that all of the transactions were made in contemplation of Mr. Haneke’s death, and, therefore, must be included in his gross estate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McGowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Jane C. Guynn, of the Estate of Vena E. Calvert, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  5. Estate of Zaiger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barry v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  3. In Re the Termination of Joint Tenancy of SinclairMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Estate of Schwab v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. ESTATE OF Mc CAMMON v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API