Legal Opinion

Morgan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1926No. 2474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter designated plaintiffs, both individually and as administrators of the estate of Carey Kettles versus the United States of America, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover on a war risk insurance contract issued to Carey Kettles while a soldier in the army of the United States. The case was submitted to the District Judge on a written stipulation waiving a jury. The findings of fact made by the District Judge are accepted by both sides as correct, and, somewhat abbreviated, they show the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Helmholz v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. Riddick v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  4. VanDeuzer v. Estate of GordonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  5. Rice v. FreelandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API