Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Hackney

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1853No. 37PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Ejectment, from Whitfield Superior Court. Decided by Judge Lumpkin. October Term, 1852. In 1847, William Henderson brought his action of ejectment against William P. Hackney and four others, for a lot of land, now in the County of Whitfield. Before the trial, Absalom Holcombe, on a showing of some privity of title, caused himself to be made a co-defendant.

Read the full summary

Ejectment, from Whitfield Superior Court. Decided by Judge Lumpkin. October Term, 1852. In 1847, William Henderson brought his action of ejectment against William P. Hackney and four others, for a lot of land, now in the County of Whitfield. Before the trial, Absalom Holcombe, on a showing of some privity of title, caused himself to be made a co-defendant. A trial was had, from which an appeal was taken, and pending the appeal, Absalom Holcombe died and his death was suggested of record. The plaintiff moved to proceed against the other defendants, which the Court refused, holding that the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

To my mind, the question submitted by this record for our decision cannot admit of a doubt.

[1.] By what is called the Practice Act in England, the landlord or other proper person, is permitted, upon application, *283to become a co-defendant in an action of ejectment. Other proper person, was defined by Lord Mansfield, in Fairclaim vs. Shantitle, (3 Burrows, 1294,) to be every person, whose title is connected to, or consistent with the title of the occupier, and liable to be divested or disturbed by any claim adverse to such possession. And the Courts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blalock v. NewhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API