Legal Opinion
Coghlan v. Glickman
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided March 15, 2001No. 3:97-cv-00683PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
In their complaint, plaintiffs herein, George and Peggy Coghlan, husband and wife, seek “judicial review” and “injunctive relief,” relative to a finding by the Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Agriculture, that the plaintiffs are ineligible for leaseback/buyback loan servicing programs because, in violation of Farmers Home Administration regulations, plaintiffs sold timber from their Farmers Home Administration mortgaged property. Characterizing this decision as arbitrary and capricious, plaintiffs, in this lawsuit,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In the Matter of Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Debtor. United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp., United States of America v. Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Regal International, Inc. And John R. Leigh, Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. Colonel Lloyd Kent Brown, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Merchants & Farmers Bank of Holly Springs, MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019