Legal Opinion

Platte Land Co. v. Hubbard

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1899No. 1461PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

Among the various propositions urged by the appellant against Hubbard’s recovery, but one ought to disturb the judgment and that only if the facts bring the case clearly within the statute of limitations. It would be so manifestly inequitable to permit the land company to keep Hubbard’s money without the conveyance or the ability to convey the land which was the consideration for its payment, that no court should hesitate in its conclusions unless staggered by some legal or equitable principle which stops its course.

In 1886, the Platte Land Company had attempted to acquire title to a good…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Homer v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Moore v. Detroit Locomotive WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Canal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Justice v. ButtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dent v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API