Legal Opinion

O'Bannor v. Cord

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 11, 1880Published

APPEAL PROM BATH COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Hargis:

October 4, 1850, James E. Walker executed his promissory note to his son, James C. Walker, for the sum of $140, due twelve months after date. The payee signed the note to Wm. H. Cord, September, 1851. And some time thereafter, it does not appear when, the latter assigned it to M. F. Cord in these words, undated: “pay to M. F. Cord pursuant to contract between us,” signed, W. H. Cord.

On that note M. F. Cord, who, it is contended, is the wife of Wm. H. Cord, but that fact does not -appear in the record and it cannot be considered, brought suit against him as administrator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  2. Hefferman v. ForwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
  3. Pilkington's v. Gaunt's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  4. Griffith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
  5. Montmollin v. Gaunt's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API