Kenney v. Wallace

Judgment affirmed.

The exceptions in this case are, that the judge below erred in removing an attachment which had been issued on the petition of Kenney against P. J. Wallace upon an allegation of fraudulent sale by P. J. Wallace to his brother, F. M. Wallace, and in requiring the plaintiff in attachment to assume the burden of proof upon the heariug of the petition of P. J. Wallace to remove the attachment. The petition for the attachment alleged *725that P. J. Wallace owed the petitioner $651.75, and for the purpose of avoiding the payment of his debts had fraudulently sold out his entire stock…