Legal Opinion

Alianell v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1934No. Appeal, 280PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to take off a nonsuit entered against him in an action of trespass to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The record shows that plaintiff was arrested on a charge of receiving stolen goods and detained in jail overnight. On the following day, at the hearing before a magistrate, the prosecutor (appellee here), at appellant’s request, agreed to withdraw the charges in consideration of a payment of twenty dollars and the return of the goods in question. This settlement was carried out and the warrant withdrawn.

It is clear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Clark v. EverettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  4. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John A. Hilfirty Martha L. Miller v. David C. Shipman Kenneth R. Schriner Brett O. Feese Stephen C. Schopfer Betty A. Noll. Martha MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Basile v. Township of SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Junod v. BaderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Thomas v. E. J. Korvette, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Davis v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API