Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 30, 1991No. 90-165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Judge.

Aurelian Smith, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion for new trial, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court heard testimony on the allegations of ineffective assistance and found that defense counsel’s conduct “was measurably below the standard of conduct this court has become accustomed to from attorneys who normally appear before it.” The trial court also found that defense counsel’s errors identified by expert witnesses were not likely to have affected the outcome of the trial. We disagree, vacate the judgment and sentence, and remand…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. JanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API