Walton v. Stokes
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
Must a plaintiff, seeking recovery under the dram shop act, show a causal relationship between the intoxication and the injuries? The trial court held there is no such burden and we agree.
Plaintiff seeks recovery under our dram shop act, § 123.92, The Code, for injuries sustained in an altercation at defendant’s lounge in Waterloo. He alleges defendant or her employees sold or gave intoxicating liquor to another patron, Charles Mhoon, until Mhoon became intoxicated, or sold or gave the liquor while Mhoon was intoxicated. Plaintiff then alleges he was injured when Mhoon, while…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. KlemesrudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Pose v. ROOSEVELT HOTEL COMAPNYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Kearney v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Woolheather v. RisleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Bistline v. Ney Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kelly v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Slager v. HWA Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Thorp v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Berte v. BodeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Kavorkian v. Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.