Legal Opinion

In re Melman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Maurice Bernard Melman was admitted to the *39practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on June 2, 1997, and at all times relevant to these proceedings, has maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.

Since September 2004, respondent has repeatedly failed to cooperate with a Departmental Disciplinary Committee investigation into complaints involving his handling of his escrow account. Over a period of five months, from September 2004 to January 2005, the Committee forwarded six complaints to respondent. To date he has not…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WertisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re BarschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. In re MelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re ReisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API