Dirk v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
After an examination of the record as directed in Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9 (Fla.1985), we find the circumstantial evidence sufficient to sustain the jury verdicts and judgments of conviction even excluding all evidence possibly tainted by the hypnotically refreshed testimony. There is no reasonable possibility that such evidence contributed to the conviction.
Imprisonment for life is the statutory maximum punishment for the offense of burglary, a felony of the first degree (§ 810.02(2)(a), Fla.Stat.). Therefore the defendant’s sentence of life imprisonment followed by twenty years probation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Bagley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- McGraw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitehead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Mallon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993