Legal Opinion

Backer v. Gomez

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 8512DC683Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

By their sole issue raised in this appeal, defendants contend that the Superior Court judgment of 4 October 1984 terminating plaintiffs’ lease with Homeland, Inc. precluded plaintiffs from asserting any leasehold rights under the lease. We disagree.

N.C.G.S. 1-289 regarding undertaking to stay execution on a money judgment provides in pertinent part that:

If the appeal is from a judgment directing the payment of money, it does not stay the execution of the judgment unless a written undertaking is executed on the part of the appellant, by one or more sureties, to the effect that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Homeland, Inc. v. BackerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API