Legal Opinion
Hix v. Robertson
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided July 12, 2006No. 10-05-00214-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
193 S.W.3d 928 (2006)
William J. HIX, Appellant
v.
William Carroll ROBERTSON and Lester Eugene Robertson, Appellees.
No. 10-05-00214-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
July 12, 2006.
Keith Woodley, Woodley & Dudley, Comanche, for appellant.
Vance Dunnam, Dunnam & Dunnam, Waco, for appellees.
Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.
ORDER REQUESTING AMICUS BRIEFING
2Per curiam
In this appeal, the trial court ruled that a specified part of Hog Creek is a statutory navigable stream and that Appellees and the general public are entitled to use that part and the entire adjoining lake for fishing,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Brown v. De La CruzTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Avila v. Lone Star Radiology, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Hix v. Robertson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006