Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Karper

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County

Decided December 5, 2007No. nos. 088 CR 2007, 089 CR 2007, 091 CR 2007, and 094 CR 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

NANO VIC, J.,

— On December 5, 2006, the defendant, Christopher D. Karper, confessed to Trooper David Klitsch of the Pennsylvania State Police and Detective Joseph Schatz of the Jim Thorpe Police Department that he had intentionally set three fires within the Borough of Jim Thorpe and taken $ 110 from the Fairview Hose Company. Defendant seeks to suppress these statements contending that they were coerced and involuntarily made. For the following reasons, we deny defendant’s suppression motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Trooper Klitsch is a deputy state fire marshal. In this position he investigates…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API