Legal Opinion

Tong Chong Chan v. New Zealand Insurance

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

Tbe plaintiff on January 11, 1901, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit brought against the defendant an action of assumpsit for five hundred dollars on a policy of insurance issued by defendant in favor of plaintiff. The property insured was *484destroyed by fire on January 20, 1900. A copy of tbe policy was attached to and made a part of the declaration. Clause 19 of the policy reads as follows: “It is furthermore hereby expressly provided, that no suit or action of any kind against the said Company for the recovery of any claim upon, under, or by virtue of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Killips v. Putnam Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Woodbury Savings Bank & Building Ass'n v. Charter Oak Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  4. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WhitehillIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Wilson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doherty v. Hartford Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Silverhorn v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API