Legal Opinion

Mize v. County of Seminole

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 24, 1969No. 38014, 38200, 38201 and 38040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

229 So.2d 841 (1969)

C. Vernon MIZE, Jr., Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF SEMINOLE, Florida, et al., Appellees.

Robert F. TUCKER, et al., Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF SEMINOLE, Florida, et al., Appellees.

Robert F. TUCKER, et al., Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF SEMINOLE, Florida, et al., Appellees.

SEMINOLE COUNTY, et al., Petitioners,

v.

Robert F. TUCKER, William T. Pratt, Jr., and James F. Latner, Respondents.

Nos. 38014, 38200, 38201 and 38040.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 1969.

Mack N. Cleveland, Jr., of Cleveland & Mize, Sanford, for C. Vernon Mize.

Harlan Tuck of Giles,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Potter v. LainhartSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  3. Ammerman v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. City of Jacksonville v. RenfroeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Couse v. Canal AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Rowe v. Pinellas Sports AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. State v. County of DadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API