Legal Opinion

BEARD v. MERCK & CO., INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2021No. 2:19-cv-05975Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2848 Civil Action No. 2:18-md-02848-HB THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Sandra F. Beard v. Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-05975 Nanjo Griffin and James Griffin v. Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00429 Hope Hartman v. Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00334 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SEPARATE PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 343 Bartle, J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API