Legal Opinion
Herman v. Gutman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
We are Of the opinion that the complaint herein is insufficient, and that the Special Term should have granted the motion of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings.
Plaintiff séeks to recover of the defendants the sum of $25,000 damages which plaintiff alleges he sustained as the result of a conspiracy between the defendants whereby the plaintiff alleges he was excluded from participation in the management and control of the affairs and business of a corporation known as Stern & Gut-man, Inc. In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that prior to April 3, 1933, he was associated with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. . Arctic Placer Mining Milling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Rhodes v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Momand v. LandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corris v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Garbarino v. Utica Uniform Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Kingston Avenue Wines & Liquors Co. v. Federated Liquor Package Stores of Kings County, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Hoffman v. AbbottNew York Supreme Court · 1943