Legal Opinion

Thomas Harold LAKE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 1988No. 86-7671, 86-7772Published

1Opinion of the Court

837 F.2d 449

46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 569,

45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,787

Thomas Harold LAKE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 86-7671, 86-7772.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 11, 1988.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 21, 1988.

Jefferson D. Kirby, III, Ford & Harrison, Paula A. Hilburn, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Lee Boothby, Boothby, Ziprick & Yingst, Berrien Springs, Mich., Frank V. Potts, Potts & Young, Florence, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ansonia Board of Education v. PhilbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Calvin Roderick CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM SAW WORKS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API