Legal Opinion

McGowan v. Kreling

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1897No. S. F. No. 720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, opening a default and setting aside a judgment. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court below opening the default of the defendant, and setting aside a judgment which had been entered upon said default in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant.

*34The action is brought against the respondent, as administratrix of the estate of William ICreling, deceased, to recover quite a large sum of money alleged to be due plaintiff for certain services averred to have been rendered by plaintiff to said Kreling, deceased, in liis lifetime. The respondent filed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled on April 26, 1895, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Chamberlin v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Huart v. GoyenecheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Underwood v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bullard v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sampanes v. ChazesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Monllor & Co. v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
  5. Sucesores de L. Villamil & Co. v. MercedSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API