Legal Opinion

People v. Hollowwa

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1934No. Crim. No. 100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of kidnaping. He has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for new trial, and has attempted to appeal from the verdict of the jury. He urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment and that the trial court committed error in overruling his objections to questions asked by the district attorney and in refusing and modifying instructions proposed by him.

It will add nothing to the case law of this state to detail the lengthy evidence contained in the reporter’s transcript. It is sufficient to say that the evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SheasbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. People v. BrunoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. People v. SchlosserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Keith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. People v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API