Legal Opinion

Brenaman v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1841 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The petitioner, Clarence H. Brenaman, was denied unemployment compensation benefits initially by the referee and on appeal by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review because the termination of his employment was caused by his own willful misconduct. He argues that although he may have committed five violations of the employment rules (including unexcused and excessive absences, tardiness and violation of the rule regarding the wearing of safety glasses), he was improperly discharged under the applicable collective bargaining agreement because his employer had…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Konnick v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Lindsay v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API