Currier v. Teske

This is an action in ejectment, and to recover rents and profits. The facts are set forth at length in the opinion, Currier v. Teske, 93 Neb. 7. The district court had found that the plaintiff was only entitled to an undivided one-half interest in the property on account of a deed having been made to Allen and Reed of the other undivided half. But it was said in the opinion by Hamer, J.: “We think that, since the testimony was undisputed that the conveyance to Allen and Reed was intended as a mortgage and was a mere lien or security on the land for the payment of fees and expenses, the…