Legal Opinion

Ehlers v. Berryhill

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 16, 2019No. 4:18-cv-01010Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MOLLY EHLERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. J Case No. 4:18-CV-01010 JAR ) ANDREW SAUL)! ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Plaintiff Molly Ehlers’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seg. For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision will be affirmed. 2 } Andrew Saul…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Marcus Hensley v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Kirby v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API