Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Willhite
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Ford district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This was an action in replevin to recover possession of a steam engine. The plaintiff’s claim to possession was based upon a chattel mortgage on the engine executed by the defendants Arthur Willhite and his wife to secure the payment of the purchase price of a threshing machine bought by Willhite from Reeves & Co., the business predecessor and assignor of plaintiff. Plaintiff also claimed a right of possession based upon a purchase of the engine at a sale of it pursuant to that mortgage.
The defendants’ answer pleaded, and their evidence…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Troendly v. J. I. Case Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Nichols & Shepard Co. v. SwisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Masopust v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925