Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Willhite

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1917No. 21,107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Ford district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action in replevin to recover possession of a steam engine. The plaintiff’s claim to possession was based upon a chattel mortgage on the engine executed by the defendants Arthur Willhite and his wife to secure the payment of the purchase price of a threshing machine bought by Willhite from Reeves & Co., the business predecessor and assignor of plaintiff. Plaintiff also claimed a right of possession based upon a purchase of the engine at a sale of it pursuant to that mortgage.

The defendants’ answer pleaded, and their evidence…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Troendly v. J. I. Case Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. SwisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Masopust v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API