Legal Opinion

Wixom Bros. Co. v. Truck Ins. Exchange

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1983No. 81-884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Insurer sought a declaratory judgment to determine its obligation to defend a pending action. This appeal ensued as a result of judgment in favor of the insurer. We reverse and remand.

This appeal necessitates a reexamination of an earlier decision of this Court, viz., Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tuscaloosa MotorCo., Inc., 295 Ala. 309, 329 So.2d 82 (1976). That case concerned a liability insurance policy whose insuring clause required the company to pay "all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay . . . caused by an occurrence." An "occurrence" was defined in the policy as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Maddox v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tuscaloosa Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Warwick Dev. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Collins by Smith v. McMurryMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Langley v. MUT. FIRE, MARINE & INLAND INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API