Legal Opinion

State v. Futrell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 30, 1925No. 27308PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Our attention has been called, by an assignment of errors, to the fact that the transcript as originally filed failed to show that the indictment against the defendant was returned and presented by-the grand jury in open court, and that the defendant was arraigned and present during the trial of the case.

After the case was argued and submitted,' the district attorney applied for a certiorari to have the record supplemented so as to show the presentation of the indictment and the arraignment of the accused, but no correction was asked with reference to the presence of the accused.

In response…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  3. State v. Joseph Christian.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  4. State v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  5. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. State v. HopperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  3. State v. AugustaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. State v. HooverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API