Legal Opinion

Claim of Cohn v. Morningstar Nicol, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

Speaking of an accident occurring to a plant worker on his way to work on the sidewalk in front of the *580employer’s premises, we said in Matter of Leatham v. Thurston & Braidich (264 App. Div. 449, affd. without opinion 289 N. Y. 804): “ It is sufficient if the accident arises logically out, of the employment and the hazards of the way in and out are part of the employment. When the accident happens from the dangers of the premises and the limits of the business there conducted, it is as though it happened upon the premises themselves. A relationship which brings the accident within the range…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cossari v. L. Stein Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  2. Claim of Rosenwasser v. Lanes Lake SuccessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Husted v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Siegel v. GaribaldiNew York Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API