Legal Opinion

People v. Docen-Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendants’ convictions must be reversed because the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt unconstitutionally diminished the People’s burden of proof and defendants thereby were deprived of a fair trial (see, People v Brinson, 195 AD2d 966; People v Towndrow, 187 AD2d 194, lv dismissed 81 NY2d 1021; see also, Sullivan v Louisiana, 508 US —, 113 S Ct 2078). We find no other reversible error in the issues raised by defendants. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. TowndrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. BrinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LUGO-ROSADO, ORLANDO, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. ContrearasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. Lugo-RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API