Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Mullen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1986No. 8526DC801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant-husband contends the evidence and findings of fact do not support an order increasing child support. We agree.

N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 50-13.7 provides that a child support order “may be modified or vacated at any time, upon motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances . . . .” This Court has stated:

The modification of the order must be supported by findings of fact, based upon competent evidence, that there has been a substantial change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the child. ... It is not necessary for the trial court to make detailed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Ebron v. EbronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Norton v. NortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Walker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bunting v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API