Legal Opinion

People v. Ramos

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*169OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald Sheindlin, J.

Following a trial by jury, defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]). The defendant moves, pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1); 330.40 (1); and 330.50, to set aside the verdict on the grounds that the prosecutor failed to turn over Brady material, to wit, the criminal record of a witness, Adolfo Guzman. The issue presented here, apparently one of first impression, is whether a defense counsel must make a specific request for Brady material in order to invoke the United States v Agurs class II standard, after the prosecutor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. WashingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API