Legal Opinion

Fergus v. Chicago Sash & Door Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mechanic’s Lien.—Error to Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

January 14, 1895, the Sash and Door company filed a petition for a mechanic’s lien upon premises of Louise L. Fergus, under a contract with her by her husband as her agent, and alleging that Goodrich, Wallace and Burke had, or claimed, some interest in the preiqises. The plaintiffs in error were duly served with summons, but paid no attention to the suit, and the petition was taken as confessed against them. Wallace and Burke were not served, but appeared, and by answer set up their own claim for a mechanic’s lien.

¡No cross-petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thielman v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Moore v. TitmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Cook v. MoultonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacyna v. BlissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  2. Shields v. SorgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Wood v. GummAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API