Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Iserman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. Docket 56065Published

1Opinion of the Court

120 Mich. App. 785 (1982)

327 N.W.2d 559

McMILLAN

v.

ISERMAN

Docket No. 56065.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 2, 1982.

Davidson, Gotshall, Kohl, Secrest, Wardle, Lynch & Clark (by William P. Hampton and Michael L. Updike), for plaintiffs.

Shaheen, Kranson & Garrett (by Jon R. Garrett), for defendants.

Before: M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J., and ALLEN and MacKENZIE, JJ.

M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J.

Plaintiffs sued the defendants, alleging that the defendants' proposed use of property in their subdivision violated an amended deed restriction which prohibited the use of any subdivision lots for a state-licensed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API