Legal Opinion

Steele v. Hanna

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This was a motion by a sheriff, against purchasers at a sheriff’s sale, for a judgment for the purchase-money and damages thereon, pursuant to the statute. The notice of the motion sets forth a judgment in the Wabash Circuit Court, in favour of one Abner Elmes against Hugh Hanna; the issue of an execution thereon, and a sale by virtue of it jointly to Hanna and Conner, the defendants, of a certain lot of ground for 2,000 dollars; the tender to the purchasers of a deed for the lot; a demand from them of the purchase-money, and their refusal to pay, &c. It also shows that there were five other…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pettit v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State ex rel. Wilber v. SalyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Dean v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Duke v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State ex rel. Danforth v. RuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API