Legal Opinion

Hain v. Newell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1923No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteeee, J.

On October 24, 1921, plaintiffs commenced an action against defendant in assumpsit by a writ of attachment personally served and levied on certain of defendant’s property valued at about $1,500. *21The action was brought to recover on two promissory notes, one given for a balance on purchase price of a Fordson tractor and the other for certain repairs and material. Plaintiffs also held a chattel mortgage on the tractor given by defendant to secure the first note. The chattel mortgage contained the usual clause authorizing plaintiffs in case of defendant’s default to take possession of and sell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paddock v. MatthewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Goebel v. StevensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Phansteihl v. VanderhoofMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jim Causley Pontiac Inc. v. World Wide Auto Leasing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API