Legal Opinion

Langston v. Langston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1930No. 20514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The declaration in this case is based upon an alleged contract, and before a verdict could be rendered in favor of the plaintiff there must be some evidence to support such a contract. On the trial the plaintiff swore that B. H. Langston, who made the contract for himself and the other defendants, “was to give me five per cent, and all expenses incurred.” Here was some evidence to sustain the contract, and, nothing more appearing, this would sustain a verdict for the full amount of commissions and expenses. However, there was some evidence to support the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RigdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co. v. Van Winkle Gin & Machine WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Dacy v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. Lee v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Jefferson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Campbell v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Sapp v. SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Davidson v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API