Legal Opinion

Ockerman v. Wise

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1953No. 11664_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties ;

And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the ap-pellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no-diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm’r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U. S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Mason v. HelmsDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ockerman v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  2. Remington v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
  3. Seymour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Seymour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API