Ockerman v. Wise
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties ;
And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the ap-pellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no-diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm’r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U. S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mason v. HelmsDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ockerman v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Remington v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
- Seymour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Seymour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956