Legal Opinion
People v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1991No. B057289PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion J.
COOPER,
* —Defendant appeals from his conviction of violation of Penal Code section 653w. The conviction was based on evidence which established that he possessed for sale some 4,500 audiotapes, identified by an expert witness as “pirate recordings.” By this appeal, he challenges the constitutionality of the statute, contending that it violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, that it is unconstitutionally over-broad, and that it is preempted by federal copyright laws.
By way of demurrer, he had, prior to trial, challenged the constitutionality of Penal Code…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cletus Robert Anderson v. Barry J. Nidorf, Chief Probation Officer Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Tain v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1987