Hunt v. Doran
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Olin B. Lewis, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action by the receiver of the Allemannia Bank to enforce payment of the defendant’s alleged liability as owner of ten shares of the capital stock of the bank. The alleged defensé was that any action to enforce such liability was barred by the statute of limitations. The action was tried by the court without a jury, and findings of fact made. As a conclusion of law, judgment was directed for the defendant on the ground that the action was barred.' The plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff’s assignments of error challenge many of the findings of fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Hunt v. RoosenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hirning v. ForsbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Shearer v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Willius v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bank of Dassel v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931